Keywords:Double skin facades, energy consumption, energy use intensity, daylight, simulations, finite element analysis (FEA), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), energy modeling
This article explores thermal, energy and daylighting performance of double skin facades (DSFs) in different climate types, specifically focusing on three typologies: box window, corridor and multi-story DSFs. These systems were investigated and analyzed to determine how different DSFs perform in comparison to each other, as well as a typical curtain wall (single skin glazed facade used as a baseline), in a multitude of climate applications. The utilized research methods included two-dimensional heat transfer analysis (Finite Element Method analysis), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis, energy modeling, and daylight simulations. Heat transfer analysis was used to determine heat transfer coefficients (U-values) of all analyzed facade types, as well as temperature gradients through the facades for four exterior environmental conditions. CFD analysis investigated three-dimensional heat flow, airflow and air velocity within air cavity of DSFs. Energy modeling and daylight simulations were conducted for an office space, which was enclosed by the analyzed facade types. Individual energy models were developed for each facade type and for fifteen different climates representing various climate zones and subzones, from very hot to arctic. For daylighting simulations, multiple models were developed to study investigated typologies of DSFs, depth of air cavity between the two skins, orientations and four climate types, as well as different sky conditions. Results indicate that there is not a lot of variation in thermal performance of the different DSF types, but that all DSF facades would have significantly improved thermal performance compared to the baseline single skin facade. Energy modeling results indicate significant differences in performance between the DSFs and single skin facade, but fewer variations between the different typologies of investigated DSFs. Moreover, the results show the effect of DSFs in different climate types on energy performance, heating, cooling and lighting loads. Daylighting results indicate that all types of DSFs would decrease daylight levels compared to a conventional curtain wall, however, the differences between lighting levels are also dependent on the orientation, air cavity depth, facade type and climate.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Ajla Aksamija
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors or their institutions retain copyright to their publications without restrictions.
Aksamija, A. (2013). Sustainable facades: design methods for high-performance building envelopes. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
ASHRAE. (2014). ANSI/ASHRAE/IES/USGBC Standard 189-2014. Standard for the design of high-performance green buildings. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2013a). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2013b). ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013. Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers.
Brandl, D., Mach, T., Grobbauer, M., & Hochenauer, C. (2014).Aanalysis of ventilation effects and the thermal behavior of multifunctional facade elements with 3D CFD models. Energy and Buildings, 85: 305–320.
Bueno, B., Wienold, J., Katsifaraki, A., & Kuhn, T. (2015). A Radiance-based modelling approach to assess the thermal and daylighting performance of complex fenestration systems in office spaces. Energy and Buildings, 94(1), 10-20.
Eicker, U., Fux, V., Bauer, U., Mei, L., & D. Infield. (2008). Facades and summer performance of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 40, 600-611.
Gelesz, A., & Reith, A. (2015). Climate-based performance evaluation of double skin facades by building energy modelling in Central Europe. Energy Procedia, 78, 555-560.
Gratia, E., & De Herde, A. (2007). Are energy consumptions decreased with the addition of a double-skin? Energy and Buildings, 39, 605-619.
Guardo, A, Coussirat, M., Valero, C., & Egusquiza, E. (2011). Assessment of the performance of lateral ventilation in double-glazed facades in Mediterranean climates. Energy and Buildings, 43, 2539-2547.
Kim, S., & Song, K. (2007). Determining photosensor conditions of a daylight dimming control system using different double-skin envelope configurations. Indoor Built Environ, 16, 411-425.
Konis, K. (2013). Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Building and Environment, 59, 662-677.
NFRC (2004). NFRC 100-2004: Procedure for determining fenestration product U-factors, Washington, DC: National Fenestration Rating Council.
Pomponi, F., Piroozfar, P., Southall, R., Ashton, P., & Farr, E. (2016). Energy performance of double-skin facades in temperate climates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1525-1536.
Shameri, M., Alghoul, M., Elayeb O., Fauzi, M., Zain, M., Alrubaih, S., Amir, H., & Sopian, K. (2013). Daylighting characteristics of existing double-skin facade office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 59, 279-286.
Viljoen, A., Dubiel, J., Wilson, M., & Fontoynont, M. (1997). Investigations for improving the daylighting potential of double-skinned office buildings. Solar Energy, 59(4), 179-194.
Zhou, J., & Youming Chen. (2010). A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 1321-1328.