Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2025.331Keywords:
Prefabricated solutions, modular construction, renovation lacks, circularityAbstract
This article presents an innovative matchmaking approach to identify the most effective modular prefabricated solutions, innovative digital technologies, and circularity criteria across different contexts. Developed with the aim to boost the retrofit rate of existing buildings, our methodology addresses critical energy retrofit needs, aligning with the European Union's ambitious climate-neutrality objectives. Modular and prefabricated solutions can speed up renovations, offering benefits in terms of indoor quality, aesthetics, environmental impact, and cost. The matchmaking approach, developed within the scope of the EU-LIFE BuildUPspeed project, capitalises on best practices (such as prefabricated modular solutions, circularity criteria, and digital technologies) across five contexts (Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands), considering local needs and capacities. A “catalogue” of retrofitting building products was compiled, including guidelines for product implementation (a technical requirements checklist). An extensive mapping of ecosystem characteristics was conducted, considering the construction market’s capacities and social, cultural, technological, and economic shortcomings that limit the use of innovative technologies. Using collaborative dialogue, developers, building experts, and local players were involved in several actions to promote, capitalise on, and identify the most effective prefabricated solutions tailored to different ecosystems. The results obtained can be used to promote targeted investments and customized retrofitting solutions for specific contexts.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giulia Paoletti, Ana Sanchis Huertas, Vera Valero Escribano, Stefano Avesani, Riccardo Pinotti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors or their institutions retain copyright to their publications without restrictions.
References
DASH Tool: 3D Automatic Surfaces Handling - REVIT Plug-in. (2020). (EU project No. 820553). BIM-SPEED Project. Retrieved from https://www.bim-speed.eu/en/News%20%20Events%20%20Documents/Training%20Material/BIMSPEED_Training_3DASHtool_CARTIF_v1.pdf
Abuzied, H., Senbel, H., Awad, M., & Abbas, A. (2019). A review of advances in design for disassembly with active disassembly applications. Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal, 23(3), 618–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.07.003
Accidents at work. (2021). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Fatal_and_non-fatal_accidents_at_work_by_NACE_section,_EU,_2021_(%25_of_fatal_and_non-fatal_accidents)_AAW2023.png
_AAW2023.png){kind=link}
Aghasizadeh, S., Tabadkani, A., Hajirasouli, A., & Banihashemi, S. (2022). Environmental and economic performance of prefabricated construction: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97, 106897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106897
Ahn, S., Crouch, L., Kim, T. W., & Rameezdeen, R. (2020). Comparison of Worker Safety Risks between Onsite and Offsite Construction Methods: A Site Management Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001890
Anaç, M., Ayalp, G. G., & Erdayandi, K. (2023). Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis. Sustainability, 15(15), 11916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511916
Ballarini, I., Paolo Corgnati, S., Corrado, V., & Talà, N. (2011). Definition of Building Typologies for Energy Investigations on Residential Sector by Tabula IEE-Project: Application to Italian case studies. Proceedings of the 12th. International Conference on Air Distribution in Rooms (Roomvent). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/53402676/Definition_of_Building_Typologies_for_Energy_Investigations_on_Residential_Sector_by_Tabula_Iee_Project_Application_to_Italian_Case_Studies
Bataglin, F. S., Viana, D. D., Formoso, C. T., & Bulhões, I. R. (2019). Model for planning and controlling the delivery and assembly of engineer-to-order prefabricated building systems: exploring synergies between Lean and BIM. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0462
Bergmans, I., Bhochhibhoya, S., & Van Oorschot, J. (2023). Assessing the circular re-design of prefabricated building envelope elements for carbon neutral renovation. Journal of Façade Design and Engineering, 11(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.A4
Bim4Ren. (2022, March 15). Technologies - Bim4Ren. Retrieved from https://bim4ren.eu/technologies/
BIMPlement. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bimplement-project.eu/project/catalogue/
Bloomframe. (2022, October 31). Home - Bloomframe. Retrieved from https://www.bloomframe.com/
Boer, D., Segarra, M., Fernández, A. I., Vallès, M., Mateu, C., & Cabeza, L. F. (2019). Approach for the analysis of TES technologies aiming towards a circular economy: Case study of building-like cubicles. Renewable Energy, 150, 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.103
BPIE. (2021, November). Deep renovation: shifting from exception to standard practice in EU policy. Buildings Performance Institute Europe. Retrieved from https://www.bpie.eu/ publication/deep-renovation-shifting-from-exception-to-standard-practice-in-eu-policy/
Brissi, S. G., Debs, L., & Elwakil, E. (2020). A review on the factors affecting the use of offsite construction in multifamily housing in the United States. Buildings, 11(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010005
Building management. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.demobv.nl/en/re-suite/building-management
Building management. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.demobv.nl/en/re-suite/building-management
Built2Spec. (n.d.-a). Retrieved November 8, 2023, from https://built2spec-project.eu/
Catalogue of constructive elements. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.bimplement-project.eu/project/catalogue/
CYPE Sofware. (2024, August 6). Open BIM Analytical Model. Retrieved from https://info.cype.com/en/software/open-bim-analytical-model/
Deep renovation packages. (2020). (D3.3). 4RinEU. Retrieved from http://www.4rineu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/4RinEU_D3.3-4RinEU-Deep-Renovation-Packages_Annex.pdfhttp://www.4rineu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/4RinEU_D3.3-4RinEU-Deep-Renovation-Packages_Annex.pdf
Demo cases: Report on deep renovation packages as tailored and implemented in the demo cases,. (2021). (D5.3). 4RinEU. Retrieved from http://www.4rineu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/4RinEU_D5.3_Deep-renovation-package-in-the-demo.pdf
Du, J., Zhang, J., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Hu, Y. (2023). Lean manufacturing applications in prefabricated construction projects. Automation in Construction, 150, 104790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104790
Dunphy, S., & Herbig, P. A. (1995). Acceptance of innovations: The customer is the key! The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 6(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(95)90014-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(95)90014-4
Energy Efficiency Directive. (2023). Retrieved from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en
Energy Matching platform. (2021). Retrieved from https://platform.energymatching.eu/
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EU/2024/1275) (2025). Retrieved December 9, 2025, from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-performance-buildings/energy-performance-buildings-directive_en#:~:text=85%25%20of%20buildings%20in%20the,decarbonised%20building%20stock%20by%202050.
ESSBAR. (2023). Retrieved from https://nachhaltigwirtschaften.at/en/sdz/projects/essbar.php
The European Green Deal. (2019). Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
EXCESS. (2022). Retrieved from https://positive-energy-buildings.eu/demo-cases/austria
Exner, D., D’Alonzo, V., Paoletti, G., Pascual, R., & Pernetti, R. (2016). Building-Stock analysis for the definition of an energy renovation scenario on the urban scale. In Green energy and technology (pp. 33–54). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44899-2_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44899-2_3
Fan, J., Chen, L., & Chen, K. (2024). Digitalizing Industrialized construction projects: status quo and future development. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5456. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135456
Founti, M., Avesani, S., & Elguezabal, P. (2023). Multifunctional façades for renovation through industrialization. Journal of Façade Design and Engineering, 11(2), V–VI. https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.00 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.00
Hoogenboom, D. (2025, February 18). The Netherlands leads Europe in prefabrication adoption. Retrieved from https://www.usp-research.com/insights/news/the-netherlands-leads-europe-in-prefabrication-adoption
Ibrahim, A., Hamdy, K., & Badawy, M. (2023). Overall barriers to the prefabricated construction industry: a Fuzzy-SEM. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3487126/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3487126/v1
INFINITE: Infinite Building Renovation - Industrialised Envelope Solutions. (2023). Retrieved from https://infinitebuildingrenovation.eu/
Katsigiannis, E., Gerogiannis, P., Atsonios, I., Manolitsis, A., & Founti, M. (2023). SmartWall. Journal of Façade Design and Engineering, 11(2), 029–050. https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.t2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2023.2.T2
Konstantinou, T., & Heesbeen, C. (2022). Industrialized renovation of the building envelope: realizing the potential to decarbonize the European building stock. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 257–283). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822477-9.00008-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822477-9.00008-5
Lassandro, P., Devitofrancesco, A., Bellazzi, A., Cascardi, A., De Aloysio, G., Laghi, L., & Malvezzi, R. (2023). Facing the constraints to the deep energy renovation process of residential built stock in European markets. Sustainability, 16(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010294
Legnattivo. (2019, January 1). Retrieved from https://www.eurac.edu/it/institutes-centers/istituto-per-le-energie-rinnovabili/projects/legnattivo
Lihtmaa, L., & Kalamees, T. (2023a). Emerging renovation strategies and technical solutions for mass-construction of residential districts built after World War II in Europe. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101282
Lihtmaa, L., & Kalamees, T. (2023b). Emerging renovation strategies and technical solutions for mass-construction of residential districts built after World War II in Europe. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101282
Lu, W., Chen, K., Xue, F., & Pan, W. (2018). Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: An analytical framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.319
Lu, W., Lee, W. M., Xue, F., & Xu, J. (2021). Revisiting the effects of prefabrication on construction waste minimization: A quantitative study using bigger data. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105579
Manual deconstruction and dismantling activities. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.baukarussell.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/BauKarussell_FAQs_re-use-of-building-components.pdf
Manzoor, B., Charef, R., Antwi-Afari, M. F., Alotaibi, K. S., & Harirchian, E. (2025). Revolutionizing Construction Safety: Unveiling the digital potential of Building Information Modeling (BIM). Buildings, 15(5), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050828
Manzoor, B., Othman, I., & Pomares, J. C. (2021). Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC)
Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116135
Metabuild GmbH. (2025, January 29). About us | Metabuild. Retrieved from https://www.metabuild.de/en/about-us/
Navaratnam, S., Satheeskumar, A., Zhang, G., Nguyen, K., Venkatesan, S., & Poologanathan, K. (2022a). The challenges confronting the growth of sustainable prefabricated building construction in Australia: Construction industry views. Journal of Building Engineering, 48, 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103935
Navaratnam, S., Satheeskumar, A., Zhang, G., Nguyen, K., Venkatesan, S., & Poologanathan, K. (2022b). The challenges confronting the growth of sustainable prefabricated building construction in Australia: Construction industry views. Journal of Building Engineering, 48, 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103935
Nußholz, J. L., Rasmussen, F. N., Whalen, K., & Plepys, A. (2019). Material reuse in buildings: Implications of a circular business model for sustainable value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118546
Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., Osei-Kyei, R., & Wanigarathna, N. (2022). Offsite Construction Methods—What We Learned from the UK Housing Sector. Infrastructures, 7(12), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7120164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7120164
P2Endure | PLUG & PLAY SOLUTIONS. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.p2endure-project.eu/en/demonstration/plug-play-solutions
Paoletti, G., Lollini, R., & Mahlknecht, H. (2013). Nearly zero energy target integration in public design tenders. Proceedings of the Sustainable Building Conference 2013 (November 2013, Vol. ISBN: 978-3-85125-301-6). Verl. der Techn. Univ. Graz. https://doi.org/10.3217/978-3-85125-301-6
Precept. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2023, from https://www.precept-project.eu/
RE onsite. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.demobv.nl/en/re-suite/re-onsite
RE suite. (n.d.). Retrieved October 16, 2023, from https://www.demobv.nl/en/re-suite
RE10 | IVE. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.five.es/project/re10/
Renovate Europe. (2023, March 15). Renovation Wave: revision of EPBD and EED - Renovate Europe. Retrieved from https://www.renovate-europe.eu/renovation-wave/
Renovation wave. (2020). Retrieved from https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/renovation-wave_en
REPowerEU. (2022, May 18). Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en
Research, I., & Research, I. (2024, December 14). EUROPE PREFABRICATED CONSTRUCTION MARKET FORECAST 2023-2032. Retrieved from https://www.inkwoodresearch.com/reports/europe-prefabricated-construction-market/?srsltid=AfmBOorEhVFX_WlkXjeDBrB6I3nzL2lN-PhBDrt_YNDbCQ2_8Ndcp1Jc
Rocha, P. F., Ferreira, N. O., Pimenta, F., & Pereira, N. B. (2022). Impacts of prefabrication in the building construction industry. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010003
Rocha, P. F., Ferreira, N. O., Pimenta, F., & Pereira, N. B. (2022c). Impacts of prefabrication in the building construction industry. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010003
Sandak, A., & Sandak, J. (2020). Aesthetics in architecture. Retrieved from https://bregroup.com/insights/aesthetics-in-architecture-beauty-and-design-inspiring-each-other#:~:text=The%20aesthetics%20of%20a%20building,%2C%20decoration%2C%20culture%20and%20context.
Sebastiani, I., D’Amore, S., Pinotti, R., & Pampanin, S. (2024). Integrated rehabilitation of reinforced concrete buildings: Combining seismic retrofit by means of low-damage exoskeleton and energy refurbishment using multi-functional prefabricated façade. Journal of Building Engineering, 95, 110368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110368
Shahpari, M., Saradj, F. M., Pishvaee, M. S., & Piri, S. (2019). Assessing the productivity of prefabricated and in-situ construction systems using hybrid multi-criteria decision making method. Journal of Building Engineering, 27, 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100979
Smart technologies. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.cultural-e.eu/technologies/
Solar window block. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.energymatching.eu/energymatching-solutions/window-block/
Steinhardt, D. A., & Manley, K. (2016). Adoption of prefabricated housing–the role of country context. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.008
Sutkowska, M., Stefańska, A., Vaverkova, M. D., Dixit, S., & Thakur, A. (2024). Recent advances in prefabrication techniques for biobased materials towards a Low-Carbon future: From modules to sustainability. Journal of Building Engineering, 91, 109558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109558
Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
Tavares, V., Gregory, J., Kirchain, R., & Freire, F. (2021). What is the potential for prefabricated buildings to decrease costs and contribute to meeting EU environmental targets? Building and Environment, 206, 108382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108382
Tavares, V., Soares, N., Raposo, N., Marques, P., & Freire, F. (2021). Prefabricated versus conventional construction: Comparing life-cycle impacts of alternative structural materials. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102705
Wang, M., Wang, C. C., Sepasgozar, S., & Zlatanova, S. (2020). A Systematic Review of Digital Technology Adoption in Off-Site Construction: Current Status and Future Direction towards Industry 4.0. Buildings, 10(11), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10110204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10110204
Zhou, Z., Syamsunur, D., Wang, L., & Nugraheni, F. (2024). Identification of Impeding Factors in Utilising Prefabrication during Lifecycle of Construction Projects: An Extensive Literature Review. Buildings, 14(6), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061764