Development and prototyping of an integrated 3D-printed façade for thermal regulation in complex geometries


  • Maria-Valentini Sarakinioti TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
  • Thaleia Konstantinou TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
  • Michela Turrin TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
  • Martin Tenpierik TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
  • Roel Loonen TU Eindhoven, Department of the Built Environment
  • Marie L. de Klijn-Chevalerias TU Eindhoven, Department of the Built Environment
  • Ulrich Knaack TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment




Currently, several research projects investigate Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology as a possible construction method for future buildings. AM methods have some advantages over other production processes, such as great freedom of form, shape complexity, scale, and material use. These characteristics are relevant for façade applications, which demand the integration of several functions. Given the established capacity of AM to generate complex geometries, most existing research focuses on mechanical material properties and mainly in relation to the load-bearing capacity and the construction system. The integration of additional aspects is often achieved with post processing and the use of multiple materials. Research is needed to investigate properties for insulation, thermal storage, and energy harvesting, combined in one component and one production technology.

To this end, the research project “SPONG3D” aimed at developing a 3D-printed façade panel that integrates insulating properties with heat storage in a complex, mono-material geometry. This paper gives an overview of the panel development process, including aspects of material selection, printing process, structural properties, energy performance, and thermal heat storage. The development process was guided by experiments and simulations and resulted in the design and manufacturing of a full-scale façade element prototype using FDM printing with PETG. The project proved the possibility of the integration of functions in 3D-printed façades, but also highlighted the limitations and the need for further developments.

How to Cite

Sarakinioti, M.-V., Konstantinou, T., Turrin, M., Tenpierik, M., Loonen, R., de Klijn-Chevalerias, M. L., & Knaack, U. (2018). Development and prototyping of an integrated 3D-printed façade for thermal regulation in complex geometries. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 6(2), 029–040.




Ashby, M. F. (2006). The properties of foams and lattices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1838), 15-30. doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1678

de Witte, D., de Klijn-Chevalerias, M. L., Loonen, R. C. G. M., Hensen, J. L. M., Knaack, U., & Zimmermann, G. (2017). Convective Concrete: Additive Manufacturing to facilitate activation of thermal mass. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering(1), 107-117%V 105. doi:10.7480/jfde.2017.1.1430

Favoino, F., Goia, F., Perino, M., & Serra, V. (2016). Experimental analysis of the energy performance of an ACTive, RESponsive and Solar (ACTRESS) façade module. Solar Energy, 133, 226-248. doi:

Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C. B., . . . Zavattieri, P. D. (2015). The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 69, 65-89. doi:

Klein, T. (2013). Integral Facade Construction: Towards a new product architecture for curtain walls: TU Delft.

Labonnote, N., Rønnquist, A., Manum, B., & Rüther, P. (2016). Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Automation in Construction, 72, Part 3, 347-366. doi:

Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483-493. doi:

Paoletti, I. (2017). Mass customization with additive manufacturing: new perspectives for multi performative building components in architecture.

Peters, B. (2016). Solar Bytes Pavilion. In D. Reinhardt, R. Saunders, & J. Burry (Eds.), Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016 (pp. 326-337). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Quan, Z., Wu, A., Keefe, M., Qin, X., Yu, J., Suhr, J., . . . Chou, T.-W. (2015). Additive manufacturing of multi-directional preforms for composites: opportunities and challenges. Materials Today, 18(9), 503-512. doi:

Sarakinioti, M. V. (2016). The spongy skin: The potentials of AM methods in cellular structures. Delft University of Technology, Delft. Retrieved from uuid:8e9de23d-4c31-4eff-bcec-131a80df08ee

Strauss, H., & Knaack, U. (2016). Additive Manufacturing for Future Facades. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3(3-4), 11. doi:10.7480/jfde.2015.3-4.875

Yang, S., & Zhao, Y. F. (2015). Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80(1), 327-342. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5